S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 8 posts ] 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 4:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:25 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Northern Indiana
Just want to throw out the opportunity for any squad that wants to do this role in the final frame.
I have no problem doing the same thing again, just don't want to monopolize the early flight.


coolon
4th Fighter Group

formerly: -=Night Stalkers=- | 44th FS Vampires | Widowmakers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
Aye!

Our problem is the "step" limit for scouts.

So far, we have not been penalized for having both the NS and Nomad folks lurch as scouts. We have not had 5 planes/pilots yet, but almost made it on frame 4. So once again I ask for relief and as long as we only have 5 or 6 "scouts" , we can use both boats and the seaplane base.

The scouts have been very good sinking boats, and it would be good to continue. I fear the IJN will increase their CAP for the last frame, but what the hell.

For now, Nomads wish to stay in the B-25 and use F33. Sucker is easier to fly than the navy planes and is fast.

Gums opines....


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:46 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
Image

This chart shows the start positions for Frame 5. Within what is available to the USN, is there any particular spot that gives an advantage for Scout Start?


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:56 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:25 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Northern Indiana
the closer a scout starts...... the better, but the closer you are to the enemy.
unless you start out heading away then turn north...

Can always fly from the land base... its pretty close anyway.

if you start out in the north west corner and head south east then turn north... or the like, it might take you away from the japanese scouts for longer.. Just do what's best for the carriers.


coolon
4th Fighter Group

formerly: -=Night Stalkers=- | 44th FS Vampires | Widowmakers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:56 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
Image

This chart should be somewhat representative of "Cool's" suggested route.

COs and flight planners are encouraged to comment on it. With no strenuous objections we will make it so. The first thing our side is required to do is advise Jabo of our preferred CBG Route and turns if any.

COs and Flight Planners please comment:

In the last Frame...

The enemy did "rather well" by flying everything but a one-flight CAP at our Fleet, AND in what seemed to be planned "waves" of the incoming attack on our Fleet was VERY successful. There is no prohibition of an "ALL STRIKE" USN Force. OTOH, one sorta feels "morally obligated" to defend an entire friendly Carrier Battle Group. With the amount of resources available, unfortunately, BOTH cannot be done properly at the same time. Sometimes "good enough" has to do.

The USN "Side" prolly has a fairly substantial lead going into Frame 5. It would be pleasant if all of our Squads were participating in something rather unusual with a "gold rush" reward if it paid off. Just remember that we gotta protect the Fleet. Our ships represent the most substantial point value to the Enemy. Suggestions solicited.


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:25 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Northern Indiana
Wolf....

I kinda want to fly a B25 this last frame... so I would be ok if you wanted to start the cv further away from prying eyes....

I've no problem basing from the CV, so if you want to have someone based there I'm good with flying the SBD again... either way.


I'll be gone til sunday so I will check back then.

Thanks!


coolon
4th Fighter Group

formerly: -=Night Stalkers=- | 44th FS Vampires | Widowmakers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
Aye!

O.K. Stalkers, F33 and head around IJN dar and then north. Somehow I feel the Nips are gonna cruise south at first, then east.

The so-called practice arenas for boats suck, but at least we lowly buffs ( that do not expect action for 30 minutes or longer) can refine aimpoints on the moving boats. Not sure if the bigger eggs are more effective than ripple of 3 x 500. Nomads have been attacking around 5,000 to 6,000 feet at 200 IAS.

Will test and report back.

Gums sends...


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 scout option
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
There "should be" a carrier that we can dedicate to "Scout Launch" at T=0 if you evaluate that as "closer" to where you "think" you might find the bad guys. IF you happen to prefer F-33, personally I would move the CV start point a bid further away from the IJN box.

Image

7. Squad Basing - each CV base up to 3 steps of squads to start play while each seaplane base may base 1 step. Afterwards CV squads may use any available carrier to replane. Seaplane scouts must return to their field to land, they cannot use carriers.

I would not characterize a B-25 as a "seaplane". That should allow historical carrier basing for that type of aircraft. However, "historical recovery" of B-25 type on the carrier might be difficult to demonstrate if more than one sortie is desired for the "scouts".


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

cron
Powered by The S-3.