Hawk wrote:
Prove to me where I am wrong! You want a video to show you where this is happening..
Actually Hawk, some gun camera would go a long way towards at least understanding the problems.
Gun camera footage has been asked for but never given.
Gun camera is a more impartial way to judge what’s happening.
Please provide some gun camera footage.
As for the B-25 tearing off wings, according to the data gathered by the FMT, they break under certain loads and that’s what’s happening.
The need to practice with all the new FMs is very important.
We are all going to have to get away from what we think we know about the planes we’ve been flying over the last 10 years and start from scratch.
I’m nowhere near as good as Dawger at explaining what’s happening when you pull off your wings but I’ll try and hopefully Dawger will have time to correct me.
The new FMs allow for much more control and deflection on all the new FMs.
Basically, you pull to hard, too fast and suddenly you go from 1G to 4G without even realizing you did it.
At that point somethings gotta give and it’s your wings that suffer structural integrity fail (what I like to call cat-astrophic failure)
Everyone should try and spend as much time in the new FMs especially if they are using them in an S3.
Hawk wrote:
You say report the problems and when you do, you say this or make an excuse it's the pilot because you god manuals say it's correct.
What have you reported that’s wrong? I missed it? Are you saying that pulling that many Gs in a heavy B-25 shouldn’t break something?
What does a “god” have to do with it?
Hawk wrote:
The S3 isn't suppose to be a testing ground for maps or planes. Some just fly the S3 because of all the BS in the MA. You're not making friends here and keeping people in the game.
I reported it so it's up to you to look into and fix it if possible.
Sadly Hawk there are few points here that you are going to have to understand.
1. In order for IEN to add new planes to the game the volunteers had to relearn (no manuals) very complicated software.
If you add a new plane and do it by the numbers that one aircraft does not match all the legacy FMs.
It’s very much apples, oranges and pears.
So, to add one new plane, all the legacy FMs have to be reviewed.
2. The FMT works very hard to go through data collection, transcribing and figuring out how the flight models work. Now they have to be tested.
There are over 200 planes and only a couple of volunteer testers.
The models are released into the Mainstream and the players don’t like it/fight over it.
4. Players make spurious reports to demean or make work for the FMT. Players refuse to cite sources, fill out data sheets or provide reports that give detailed accounts.
5. The discovery that that many players actually practice in their S3 rides meant that the new FM would be tested a lot and reviewed.
It seemed like the only way the new FMs would be vetted.
In conclusion Hawk, we are all testers now and the more you wring out the new FMs the faster this process can go until it reaches its conclusion.
If you don’t want to add new planes to the game please make a post about it about in the S3 forum as well as the IEN boards.
I’m sure they’ll be happy to remove all the planes added since Target left and return al the FMs to what they were. I’m not being facetious I’m serious.