S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 4 posts ] 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: WTC Frame 2 CO AAR
PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 3:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
My thinking was this....

Most probably the VVS would concentrate on the eastern frontier but I had to be ready to respond up north.

23FG struck the radar at 241 to confuse the issue for the VVS and that appeared effective. 23FG was engaged much of the night in the east.

475FG was split into 4 2 ship hunter/killer units looking for AI raids and several were destroyed. Losses to these pairs did occur. Two were caught low by a large group. Two died in collisions with debris, one disco and one landing accident.

The Reaction Force spent much of the frame in the east countering a nearly constant enemy presence at the D in Feodosiya.

SIDE NOTE: We make a big deal about these DDS maps yet when I gave geographic references using the DDS the replay was many don't have it. I think individual group CO's should be responsible for translating the coordinates if he has guys he cant be bothered to grab the map. Asking the Frame CO to do so is bad form.

SIDE NOTE 2: Ten mile radar is nearly useless. I should have designated a North and East GCI at frame start and ordered the groups to only provide a GCI when a member died.

AE's patrolled western shipping and was later tasked with northern frontier patrol.

After early losses in the east the enemy became hesitant to penetrate deep. Up north the enemy appeared content to stay disengaged and far north and the AI were easy pickings. I personally killed 4 within visual range of 9 enemy aircraft near F6.

I think we lost four ships but we lacked the resources to effectively cover the ships with the need to have effective numbers at the point of contact.

The enemy was not aggressive and allowed us to concentrate forces. A more aggressive early frame effort in the east by them would have caught the Reaction Force out of position and may have ended badly for the 23FG but I gambled that would not be the case.

A last minute attempt to lure the northern enemy into a meat grinder was less than successful. The trap was well set but we couldn't seem to bring our numbers to bear aggressively and the enemy withdrew north.

Terrain problems hampered operations severely, causing losses. THE IDIOCY of STICKY GRASS. That sums it up. Because some knucklehead ackstarred in a bomber a decade ago we have sticky grass AT DIRT FIELDS.

Overall it appeared a big victory for the Axis. The VVS really didn't attack and we killed a lot of AI. We lost some ships which may prove the equalizer in the points but there should be a point deduction for failure to simulate the Soviet Juggernaut. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: WTC Frame 2 CO AAR
PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:30 pm 

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:47 pm
Posts: 218
Dawger, <S>

Outstanding job last night. You are correct the VVS did not appear to be overly active with the exception of the 352nd in the east who played drag and bag in there own radar areas.
127 Wing of the reactionary force did find a few P 39 exploiting the radar hole in the southeast corner, and with the help of the ack weeinies was able to put a stop to them harassing our ports.
We lost at least one or two to bad landings, (rusty more then sticky grass), and a couple I believe to enemy action.
All in a all sir you did a great job. My apologies to LF 6 for sporadic GCI but there were times when nothing was on the screen,

<S>

Swede- SL JG 416 127 Gruppe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: WTC Frame 2 CO AAR
PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm
Posts: 750
Having played GCI the 2nd half of the frame....it was nothing sparked by frantic typing as everyone suddenly appeared. LF6 did a great job, and I'm sorry if I comm jammed you guys on country:)

Dobs


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: WTC Frame 2 CO AAR
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:38 am 

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:47 pm
Posts: 218
=dobs= <S>

No apology needed, sometimes an extra set of eyes helps.

Nice frame to all.

Swede-


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.