S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame IV Orders TWF
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Taking a better look at the map, the LW would need to beat us by 8 closed, including 3 fields before we have a chance of the front advancing enough to get 77. We need to close more outposts, fields than they do to push back the front. 79 (SAF) is worth 6 points, but 2 outposts @ 3 each are worth 6 points also. ;)


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame IV Orders TWF
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:58 am
Posts: 103
Beaver open to any ideas to increase take on ground target. I just don't see that happening unless we protect the assest. Sending out more heavy fighters cuts down on us gaining air superiorty to then take down targets. That's where I'm coming from sir.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame IV Orders TWF
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:51 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:04 am
Posts: 417
Bombers: 15 points
Based at F77: Close 14, 80(first sortie), 91(second sortie)

Heavy Fighters: 73 points
South Sector: 62, 46, 45, 56, 51, 50, 61, 59, 57 (Total points: 28)
Center Sector: 49, 55, 44, 43, 42, 41 (Total points: 20)
North Sector: 15, 36, 67, 71, 34, 33, 66, 74 (Total points: 25)

Total: 88 points

WILZ has given us room to pick the targets to hit, for the most part. Providing this info to those selecting targets to show possible points accumulated. Also, if we were to focus on taking down all these outposts with heavy fighters, we would most likely close the gap and move the front line back to the East. Of course, they will pick up points during the frame, but I think they'll be very concerned about our frantic activity that they will not be as effective as they were in the last frame. WILZ has pointed out that two (1k) bombs on the beige tent will close down all outposts that do not have remote ack clusters (34, 36, and 46, for example).

Count up all the outposts. There's 23 of them that could be closed within the first 40 minutes, if our fighters could get to them NOE. A 500 foot radar ceiling should be very easy to maintain. As WILZ has said, your first pass must close it because if the four guns don't go down, strafing will be very dangerous. P38's carry 2 x 1000 and that is more than you need to wipe out an outpost.

We have to be extremely aggressive this frame.

Good luck, fellas <S>


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame IV Orders TWF
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 1:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Ottawa
Question/observation on attacks against Posts to destroy the RadarStn objects (tents with antenna in this terrain).
To the best of my knowledge, the only objects that affect radar detection in this terrain are RadarEm.
Unless someone has changed some settings somewhere, attacks against the RadarStns will have no effect on Axis radar coverage.

Location of RadarEm objects are marked on my map with a radar dish symbol (red triangle with a line sticking out of it).
Near front at F26, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 90.


Muzz
muzz--
Sqn Ldr
past-CO 417 Sqn RCAF
"Supporting Liberty and Justice"
--------------------------------------
Muzz's Maps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame IV Orders TWF
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 2:21 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:38 am
Posts: 1470
I believe this is a common MA terrain. Radar coverage should be the same.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame IV Orders TWF
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:04 am
Posts: 417
We need someone to confirm the radar question, once and for all, please.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

cron
Powered by The S-3.