S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3
 >> Next 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:59 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
Salute!

I tried plotting all the DAR on the PDF map and the map was basically covered.

There's a small area northwest of our northern outposts, but we shoul still see attackers 30 miles away or more.

Gums...


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:29 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
-fooo- wrote:
Looking if anyone has radar coverage plotted on the map.


Here's one made just to show the perimeter radar coverage. Beyond that perimeter, just assume you are on their dar.

Image


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:49 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:25 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Northern Indiana
If dewolf's radar map is accurate, then we would only need to kill 2 or 3 emitters to blind them over OUR targets.
Making it impossible for them to intentionally avoid our CAP while striking OUR fields.

This has nothing to do with blinding them from seeing our bombers or strikes over their targets.


coolon
4th Fighter Group

formerly: -=Night Stalkers=- | 44th FS Vampires | Widowmakers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
Salute!

Actually, there are 4 enemy DARS of concern, and two are at large fields.

T48, T49, LAF53 and LAF54.

T48 and T49 might be had, and they cover our northern tgts along with LAF53

Gums sends.


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:14 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:25 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Northern Indiana
Quote:
Actually, there are 4 enemy DARS of concern, and two are at large fields.


THAT is a horse of a different color.


coolon
4th Fighter Group

formerly: -=Night Stalkers=- | 44th FS Vampires | Widowmakers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
Image

The "Perimeter" graphic was prepared exclusively to show at which point enemy radar became a factor. This one more accurately shows the amount of radar coverage in the area in question.


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:21 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 164
thanks for the radar coverage... given the density of it, we just have to assume they see our every more :o


_______________________________________
-fooo-
23rd Fighter Group, 76th Fighter Squadron


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:33 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:28 pm
Posts: 106
I don't know fooo, it might be a good idea to remove the array at 29. The Knights have been active out of 44 and that would open up a large amount of radar free CAP zone.


Colonel mt-dew
Commanding Officer
-=Night Stalkers=-
"If you see us, it's already too late"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:38 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 164
mtdew - can you that and attack shipping in same 1st sortie? that would seem like a long ride and probably beg to fly inland... ????


_______________________________________
-fooo-
23rd Fighter Group, 76th Fighter Squadron


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 5 Idea
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:28 pm
Posts: 106
-fooo- wrote:
mtdew - can you that and attack shipping in same 1st sortie? that would seem like a long ride and probably beg to fly inland... ????



Yes we can remover that radar. If we use England to launch from I would call it destroyed at or just before T+20. The Mossie has legs to fly the entire frame so we will head straight out from there. Actually I will probably only sortie two a/c to the radar and have the others head straight to the shipping lanes.


Colonel mt-dew
Commanding Officer
-=Night Stalkers=-
"If you see us, it's already too late"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3
 >> Next 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.