Frame 3 Prelims

=dobs= · **Joined:** Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm **Posts:** 750

Quote:

but sending suicide attacks at the beginning of the frame is a waste of time and lives.

Bwahahahahahaha......

rcflys · **Joined:** Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:09 pm **Posts:** 129

=dobs= wrote:

Quote:

but sending suicide attacks at the beginning of the frame is a waste of time and lives.

Bwahahahahahaha......

its the truth dobs and even you as WSO from military experience know that. sorry the truth hurts but i'm right on my previous post.

Swede- · **Joined:** Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:47 pm **Posts:** 218

Kind of a moot point since only dead pilots can fly kami anyway....no early strike for them

Do agree that the one kami group we are allowed, spread out and use different vectors to the CV's
Stick with the over all swarming of the CVs, clear the fighters out allow the strike pilots to hit, then whoever does not make it back can
up later (but not to late) in the g4ms for kami strikes.

Swede- CO 416 RCAF / 127 Wing

dawger · **Joined:** Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm **Posts:** 661

rcflys wrote:

I prefer the all out attack plan that you mentioned at the beginning of the thread. Safety in #'s is what will need in order to clear the CV cap with the fighters. no offense dawger but sending suicide attacks at the beginning of the frame is a waste of time and lives. if were going to have any chance of sinking the carriers we need to do it in sequence.

dawger wrote:

Everybody dead at T+ 60 takeoff at T + 70 on the Kamikaze then split up and go solo.

I will type slower this time.

Every DEAD (Already shot down and can't fly anymore) pilot by T + 60 can participate in the Kamikaze strike.

These DEAD (Already shot down and can't fly anymore) pilots can takeoff at T+ 70 on the Kamikaze raid.

Nothing in this suggestion interferes with the mass raid at the beginning of frame. It will only affect the pilots that get KILLED before T + 60.

-dazed · **Joined:** Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:36 pm **Posts:** 191

dawger wrote:

I will type slower this time.

Required for successful communication:

1) transmission
2) reception
3) proper processing of received transmission

Omitting 1 of these 3 renders communications a failure.

Altering the speed of the transmission, (or increasing the volume thereof), may increase the probability of reception, but you just can't fix inability to process.

Hawk, I like that you are wanting to go punch these guys in the nose, and we look forward to an early engagement. Bring the numbers to bear and we'll do our best to make a hole for a successful strike! The only fear I have is that if we get wiped out early, any remaining Allied strike groups will have free reign over our assets. Still... I'd rather go all in on offense than worry about playing defense. It will be a fun frame, and we will either be Titans, or chumps. Now if we can just get the Allied folks to announce their intentions!

rcflys · **Joined:** Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:09 pm **Posts:** 129

-dazed wrote:

dawger wrote:

I will type slower this time.

Required for successful communication:

1) transmission
2) reception
3) proper processing of received transmission

Omitting 1 of these 3 renders communications a failure.

Altering the speed of the transmission, (or increasing the volume thereof), may increase the probability of reception, but you just can't fix inability to process.

Hawk, I like that you are wanting to go punch these guys in the nose, and we look forward to an early engagement. Bring the numbers to bear and we'll do our best to make a hole for a successful strike! The only fear I have is that if we get wiped out early, any remaining Allied strike groups will have free reign over our assets. Still... I'd rather go all in on offense than worry about playing defense. It will be a fun frame, and we will either be Titans, or chumps. Now if we can just get the Allied folks to announce their intentions!

Agreed

=dobs= · **Joined:** Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm **Posts:** 750

I reckon my sense of humor is different than most...but the irony of waste of lives and timing of Kami attack struck me as seriously funny.

rcflys · **Joined:** Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:09 pm **Posts:** 129

=dobs= wrote:

I reckon my sense of humor is different than most...but the irony of waste of lives and timing of Kami attack struck me as seriously funny.

I don't see wasting lives as funny dobs.

=dobs= · **Joined:** Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm **Posts:** 750

Dude you are just fricking clueless....

rcflys · **Joined:** Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:09 pm **Posts:** 129

=dobs= wrote:

Dude you are just fricking clueless....

not really.

I have my own sense of humor. and I don't need you or dawger to judge me.

S3 Series

Register

Login

Frame 3 Prelims

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Who is online