S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 6 posts ] 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
Salute!

posted this to get away from the main thread on the subject.

@ Darryl, et al

A few years back we tested the radar range and height in the actual arena by one of us changing sides or having a friendly enemy on line and use ch 100. That's the only way to do it.

We tested the range and the altitude.

Best I recall, range was accurate but the altitude was MSL and not local AGL, so terrain masking was not possible.

We did not have the remote "radar station" then, only the emitter antennas and a small hut next to it.

One base I can see to test this is F84. That way you don't get radar hits from another base. This gives you range and altitude. Then find a base down south where the emitter and "station" are not co-located. Repeat the drill.

Gums sends...


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:11 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Posts: 19
I'm sure they'll pipe up sooner than later, but the existence of two types of radar-emitting objects ("emitter" and "Station") was confirmed by wilz and ohshix through just such an experimental approach in the S3 arena. Wilz selectively destroyed either of those two objects at a variety of bases and watched to see if radar detection of ohshix in-flight was lost. The conclusion was that both types of objects allowed radar coverage. In fact, it has been noted that in some maps, if a field has both types of objects, both need to go down to kill dar coverage from that base. This is apparently a fairly recently change from only having the emitter tower structures being radar-capable.


Brushman
WB handle: -bman-
CO, 75th Fighter Squad, 23rd Fighter Group


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:16 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
Salute1

TNX, Brush.

Must be a change from those golden days of yesteryear.

Gums sends...


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:51 am 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:38 am
Posts: 1470
Important to use grnlabels and see if both object types have the emitter code. Mystery solved if so.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:12 am
Posts: 245
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Ground Labels are FxxxRD001 for the Emitters and FxxxRS001 for the Stations


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 5:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 672
Location: Florida
TNX shix

Looks like the "radar stations" have a fiber optic connect to the enema radar grid. They don't emit, but they can get data from whatever is up.

Gotta see the test procedure and set up one that :

- Go to other side and watch from way far away. That dude does not fly. So we need a third troop to nuke the emmiter and radar station. May need to take two hops, but emitter goes first.
- eliminate an emitter that is close to the radar limit we use for the series while our other test pilot is within "x" range of the radar station but not the emitter range. No other emitters within the range we use for the series
- See if the target goes away when the emitter is toast
- We have to have the colored blips and not all the grey ones from both sides

I think that the "radar station" was introduced for the Japan series. I can understand an integrated air defense system with a station getting data from afar, but this stretches my understanding of the tactical scenarios versus a basic strategic series against the LW or IJN.

The mobile dar that the LW had in WW2 was great for point defence. Way ahead of the Brit Chain Home array, which was fixed and did not have great azimuth or altitude capabilities.

see: http://spitfiresite.com/2010/04/deflati ... ar-ii.html

Gums sends...


"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.