S3 Series http://squadselectseries.com/s3forum/ |
|
WTC plane comparison http://squadselectseries.com/s3forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=791 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Rock-- [ Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
A big thx for the info Robert. |
Author: | dewolf [ Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
Nice chart. <S> |
Author: | jabo [ Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
Love the research that went into this Robert. If you have something for other a/c I would like to link it on the S3 page or host it for you. |
Author: | trigr= [ Wed Sep 10, 2014 2:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
FYI propellor torque is modelled backwards on the LA5FN, should be right handed and is left handed. That is the major force since the engine precession in a short crankshaft radial is relatively weak. trigr= |
Author: | pappyb [ Wed Sep 10, 2014 2:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
Now we know why it rolls to left on TO....... |
Author: | Robert [ Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
Thanks rock, dewolf and jabo. I've tested and ranked all the planes in Warbirds (Will re-rank with new FM releases), and even made a beta webpage (http://www.wbplanecompare.com) some half year ago. However I have no education in programming webpages and after 30+ hours of searching for a solution of a problem, with no success, I pretty much laid the project on ice. P.S. The problem was how to make a dropbox fetch info (i.e. firepower or turn-rate) from my database and subsequently post the results once the user had choosen two planes to compare and pressed the "go" button. |
Author: | zinhwk [ Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: WTC plane comparison |
Tells you the caliber of players in the S3 when the very first thing posted on both sides is a/c performance and setting strategy accordingly. We combated in almost comically predictable flight profiles but great fun nonetheless. A suggestion Robert is maybe display the raw numbers below the comparison window. The stars are great quick reference, but at least for me, I like to ask why We rated the La-FN the fastest down low with that wicked Boost 2. It may not sustain speeds for long but if you gotta scoot to survive...or kill, it will make the LW look like a Volkswagon, and we saw this in low engagements. Wing tearing notwithstanding. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |