S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page
1, 2
 >> Next 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:28 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
Ok, guys, let's talk about Frame 2.

What did and didn't work in Frame 1 and how to we take it to them.

Beaver had a good plan, but with the weak guns not good for strafing (B25Cs did nothing on the tanks) and the CA screwing us over, what are some ideas.

I think the the bombers have to take the Wellingtons this time out.

The floor is open for discussion.


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Ottawa
For field closures, buffs are a necessity. .303s can straff down ack, but structures just soak up too much ammo. I think the KoN had some success straffing with .50cals.

.50cal Ack at some ESPs is frightening. With three aircraft attacking in a coordinated fashion we got one ack and our three birds were either smoking or missing parts. Recommend mass attacks only, or soften up the ack with a few eggs from the buffs.


Muzz
muzz--
Sqn Ldr
past-CO 417 Sqn RCAF
"Supporting Liberty and Justice"
--------------------------------------
Muzz's Maps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 9:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
Sounds good. The AE did a great job covering us last time. How about if I use the RCAF 127 Wing and the AE as coverage for the bombers and the 4th and 352nd on a search and destroy mission of their bombers?

Please let me know what you think.


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
RCAF 127 Wing will be happy to provide escort. ;)

Perhaps we should try to close 52, could do that from some alt, and we could take Hurricanes to go with the Wellingtons. :)


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:26 am 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:38 am
Posts: 1470
Guns wont kill tanks people kills tanks :) You will need bombs for sure. Taking down their better bombers will get you good points too. Allies used the FEBA very well in the south in Frame 1. Looks like it will be in the north this time but their are two close friendly fields there.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:36 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
Is accurate to assume that NO GVs would be able to roll on our base in the FEBA?


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:50 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
I am not sure how the front is going to move, but I am thinking of hitting 46 or 48.

We will need more bombs than the Knights can bring, especially if the AI's screw up again. All satellite sites need to go down.


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 1:07 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
JABO

Hawk wrote:
Is accurate to assume that NO GVs would be able to roll on our base in the FEBA?


Howcomeitis? Dept.

Image
Enemy Tank at TAC 38

Image
Map view from TAC 38 to the SE towards the Axis base of TAC 49

Image
River separating TAC 38 and TAC 49

Do the enemy tanks actually LAUNCH from TAC 38 instead of their actual base field? In order to get to the location shown in the screenie, that tank would have to be a part of a force that:
1. Took the TAC 36 Airfield
2. Took the bridge at TAC 36. Took TAC 36
3. Took TAC 34. Took the bridge at TAC 34.

Alternately, are the Allies to understand that all Axis GVs are now amphibious? Is Allied equipment also amphibious? There is NO BRIDGE for the GVs to cross DIRECT from their base field of TAC 49 to the Allied FEBA. Suspension of disbelief required for this to "work".


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
Do you think F52 would be a better target? It's a small field and I think we can close it with what bombers we have.


Attachments:
DAR.jpg
DAR.jpg [ 237.35 KiB | Viewed 1952 times ]
52.jpg
52.jpg [ 112.68 KiB | Viewed 1952 times ]


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Last edited by Hawk on Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 2 thoughts
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:59 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:38 am
Posts: 1470
No the tanks are pretty stupid and will get stuck in the river valleys. Just in real life I guess.

FEBA launches from a remote spawn not at the field unless it is defending. Von and Dan have fixed them respawning very quickly. There will be a delay before they roll again.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page
1, 2
 >> Next 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.