S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 5 posts ] 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: TSU Plane comparison
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2015 5:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:09 pm
Posts: 620
<S> Allies.
Here is a short comparison of the fighters. Feel free to use it to plan tactics against the different bandits.

Speed: 5k - 20k - 30k
109G6: 341 - 389 - 390 mph
C.205: 340 - 387 - 377 mph
C.202: 325 - 359 - 331 mph
Spit 9: 324 - 373 - 397 mph
P38-F: 333 - 380 - 376 mph

Turn Rate at deck
109G6: 19,6 sec/lap
C.205: 22,9 sec/lap
C.202: 18,5 sec/lap
Spit 9: 18,1 sec/lap
P-38F: 17,1 sec/lap

Climb Rate: 10k - 20k (150 mph)
109G6: 4000 - 4020 ft/min
C.205: 3100 - 3220 ft/min
C.202: 3440 - 2610 ft/min
Spit 9: 3870 - 3290 ft/min
P-38F: 2740 - 2230 ft/min


Good hunting gentlemen!
/Robert
4th FG


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: TSU Plane comparison
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Hey Robert, according to the run rate, the P38F has the best turn rate on the deck :o

That surprises me, I would have thought the Spit IXe and the 202 would be better.


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: TSU Plane comparison
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 4:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:09 pm
Posts: 620
Yep, old flightmodels are not very historical. Just look at the G6 climbrate :-). (should be more like 3100 - 2100 ft/min)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: TSU Plane comparison
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 5:19 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
The P38, contrary to misinformation, has a big fat wing, low stall speed and excellent power to weight ratio.

It's foibles were roll rate and low critical Mach limiting its dive.

Stall speed, excess power and induced drag determine turn performance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
 Post subject: Re: TSU Plane comparison
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:21 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:42 pm
Posts: 392
109 had a very good climb rate that's what gave it an edge even over the P-51. 4,000ft/min probably not, but not a slouch to all other aircraft. I need to look back at Reichlin data. German test also reveal a loss about 10-15kph with gondolas in level flight IIRC, not quite as much of an airbrake as some would believe. If you are referencing Allied test data it is even self describing as faulty. The radiators were broken from the belly landing. The engine was overheating quickly and max power, or even cruise was not achieved in long duration.


<S>
Zinhwk

HADES Flight
475th FG (v)
zinhwk@fly-jg77.com


Windows 10.1
AMD A10 6800K Black Edition (OC 4.2Ghz)
16 GB DDR3
GeForce GTX 770Ti
1TB SATA Western Digital "Blue" HDD
24" LG LED 1080p
CH Controls


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.