S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page
1, 2
 >> Next 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
 Post subject: Frame 2 SOM discussion
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:49 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:54 am
Posts: 256
Location: Tulsa
OK gents lets open a line of communication on what worked what didn't work in frame 1 so we can best optimize our forces ??

AE's/8th had a great CGI our second hop that worked with the 475th and us to coordinate a great timing a intercept of a enemy fighter sweep pinching them between us .. i personally want to thank Dazed for saving my bacon :)

ideas ? suggestions ?


Besea

C.O. American Eagles
besea@cox.net


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm
Posts: 750
So the axis sent a sweep down South. 475th/RCAF avoided the sweep and hit the bomb group and escorts. I directed RCAF to hit bombers while we kept the escorts occupied (hindsight...I didn't have the authority to do that).....not sure that order got fully implemented/followed.

Ended up in a swirling dervish (I know right?), and then I hit the bombers when escort was cleared off to west.

Good news was AE/8th came in and found the bomb group and started swatting them.

The key is NOT to engage their sweep. I think they will learn from their mistakes and have out-riggers for their sweep this time,or all be escort.

Either way, coherent cooperation with engagement simultaneous or near simultaneous is desired.

Good GCI is vital.

Having some guys dedicated to going out against the marauding strikers on our shipping would be a good plan. Maybe Knights?

Just my 2 cents.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:42 pm
Posts: 392
Will have to take a look at the points results to gauge sound strategy. Not sure if the end result of our bombing campaign was fruitful, even though our bombers seemed to have far more effect on target than their's.

4th gave away strategy in their video, parking over Pantelleria and effectively taking them out of the fight. I don't think they will do the same this frame considering our effective pouncing of the bomb group. If all 4 FGs protect a bomb mission we will probably need all hands on deck to counter.


<S>
Zinhwk

HADES Flight
475th FG (v)
zinhwk@fly-jg77.com


Windows 10.1
AMD A10 6800K Black Edition (OC 4.2Ghz)
16 GB DDR3
GeForce GTX 770Ti
1TB SATA Western Digital "Blue" HDD
24" LG LED 1080p
CH Controls


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:36 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:54 am
Posts: 256
Location: Tulsa
AE's/8th launched at t+0 and set up N for Malta .. when contacts appeared on Dar was directed with Ni fighters to 8 4 x for intercept..we approached the 8 4 x from the east with the sun at our backs.. Ni fighters got engaged before us and lost 1 to the 352nd. spotting the enemy fighters some low most still high .. we went into a wagon wheel left with about 12 enemy fighters.. not falling into the trap when they would send one low under us on several occasions .. after 3 rotations..hearing the buffs had passed us and us heading in the direction of Malta we broke and flew south with the enemy to our North ..we was able to catch the enemy buffs just before feet dry. with No escorts.. AE's/8th was happy we kept about 12 escort from doing their jobs keeping the occupied for a few minutes..

i think we was really lucky in the fact we only was tied up 12 AC and not their entire force.. at once.. being out that far from home base alone i kinda felt before the frame we was bait.. i also think sending low #'s into a mass is not the answer..in my book.. i kinda thinking of mallory's big wing would be more accurate to this scenario..

maybe first off should head south and cap our fleet before returning N for intercept ??


Besea

C.O. American Eagles
besea@cox.net


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
I agree with about our bombers not be effective. I think we should put all the Knights in fighters for now.


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 300
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
Let's see how the BDA looks but Rcflys will begin planning tonight - anyone wishing to discuss catch us on out TS. This will be his losing virginity frame so be a little nice than normal :)


=weis=
8th FG CO


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:11 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 88
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Point to ponder:

There are many very high value, one time, targets on Malta that will be very appealing to the enemy. F221 is one of those and delivers 25 points to the LW. They have to sink 3 freighters to equal that one target and freighters and destroyers have to be bombed.....not strafed. The other big point targets are identified in the Points Summary chart on the S3 website. It is virtually certain the enemy will not ignore these targets in this series.

Crommm
American Eagles


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 1:48 am 

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:47 pm
Posts: 218
dobs <S>

"I directed RCAF to hit bombers while we kept the escorts occupied (hindsight...I didn't have the authority to do that).....not sure that order got fully implemented/followed." At the time of your order there were only two RCAF pilots with you, we had gone south to intercept the attack on the convoy we lost one to gravitational pull on the rivets, and two had to rtb for ammo after expending all ammo killing one strike pilot. Muzz and myself were separated a bit, so we did not mind at all attacking the buffs while you kept the fighters busy, your "order/request" was spot on with no thought given by us as to whom had command and control.. as it should be when engaging against great odds.
No worries from us and if it happens again the result will be the same outcome.

Swede- CO 416 RCAF / 127 Wing


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm
Posts: 750
Swede...copy all. Meant to talk to y'all that night and didn't.

Forgot we had sent two guys down to kill a marauding bomber....

Looking forward to Frame 2!

Dobs


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Just a point for RCflys.

The rules state that we can launch no more than 2 steps at T+0, 475/RCAF is worth 3 steps, so we can't launch as a whole group at T+0. That is why I had the AE/8th launch at T+0. After that, Jabo says we can launch a field the 475/RCAF can lift together.


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page
1, 2
 >> Next 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.