S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 7 posts ] 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 716
Location: Ottawa
Noticed something on my machine last night. The two revetments at the field did not render (i.e. show up) until I was flying under ~3050ft. Made dive bombing a bit tricky to say the least. I reproduced the issue online in the S3 arena this morning (~1000hrsEST). Offline same issue. I also noted bomb craters were not rendering inside the airfield area. It seems like the runway texture is suspended a few inches above the surrounding terrain elevation.
I had a quick check of the other UK fields and didn't notice a problem elsewhere. Could someone please independently confirm my findings?


Muzz
muzz--
Sqn Ldr
past-CO 417 Sqn RCAF
"Supporting Liberty and Justice"
--------------------------------------
Muzz's Maps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:58 pm
Posts: 341
Muzz wrote:
Noticed something on my machine last night. The two revetments at the field did not render (i.e. show up) until I was flying under ~3050ft. Made dive bombing a bit tricky to say the least. I reproduced the issue online in the S3 arena this morning (~1000hrsEST). Offline same issue. I also noted bomb craters were not rendering inside the airfield area. It seems like the runway texture is suspended a few inches above the surrounding terrain elevation.
I had a quick check of the other UK fields and didn't notice a problem elsewhere. Could someone please independently confirm my findings?


Yup. Seems like F6 is the only one that has that kind of a dirt terrain. Almost everything else is grass or paved. You can simply reproduce the issue by looking at the field in the tower and then use the zoom to see the hangers appear and disappear

~S~
-noflyz


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:53 am
Posts: 362
Yes, field 6 always been like that. Rest seem ok


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:00 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
Image

Certainly not an illusion.

Once upon a time, the terraformers discovered that it was helpful to place the bottom of the building "footings" at some "minus" elevation rather than just plopping objects down on the terrain. Objects which looked just fine in plan view, when seen from ground level had portions of the buildings well above the terrain, particularly when on sloping or hilly grade. I have screenies of hillside concrete bunkers and and other buildings which only had about 1/2 of their footings in the ground, the other half "floating" above the ground. Cantilever construction is possible, but expensive, and certainly was not what was intended. There are likely still examples which can be found, but to the terraformers' credit, the problem was "fixed" by lowering the buildings. I'd doubt that any newer terrain would continue to show similar examples.

Image
"Fixed" Condition. The whole tent is there, the appropriate parts are just below grade.

Image

EDIT

Image

Shown is the actual condition of the revetments at F-6. The first screenie was grabbed from "below grade" not AT grade as is the above. These revetments are actually well sunken into the surrounding terrain. The characterization that there is a "bug" is likely appropriate.


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:02 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:38 am
Posts: 1470
If you put a runway like F6 on a terrain that is not completely flat it will float over the uneven parts and hide anything beneath it as it renders. This changes as the distance changes. The only way to fix that is to flatten the terrain heightfield or move the field slightly so it lies on completely flat areas. It would be nice to redo the 1940 era Channel using a new terrain fields etc. On the list. Hmmm I wonder where I could find someone that has all the info about airfields and targets in this area... Hmmmmmm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
In that caseF6 should be ruled closed as RCAF+8th bombed it 4 times, bunkers hiding undergroud are hard to bomb!


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:15 am
Posts: 917
Image
Image


Happy trails...
Wolf
XO 352nd Fighter Group (virtual)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.