S3 Series http://squadselectseries.com/s3forum/ |
|
TTT - Frame 2 - DAR http://squadselectseries.com/s3forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1277 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | noflyz [ Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:41 am ] |
Post subject: | TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
We took down 6 so this is how she looks for Frame 2. Attachment: Screen Shot 2015-03-23 at 9.39.46 PM.png [ 276.76 KiB | Viewed 1654 times ] Attachment:
|
Author: | MuskieZZ [ Tue Mar 24, 2015 12:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
Did we take down 6? I thought it was just 4 and 5? |
Author: | Hawk [ Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
Nope 6 went down as well. I think we close 4 sites but can't remember. |
Author: | Beaver [ Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
We closed 4, 5 & 6 and there were a few attacks on F2, but I don't believe that happened. |
Author: | Gums [ Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
Banzai! Too much about DAR. Sheesh. Best I can figure the U.S. had one or maybe two emitters on the north shore or maybe west shore. Good range, as they were long wavelength like the Brit stuff. The LW and Reich Naval stuff was lots better, mobile and shorter wavelength for accuracy. My input is to limit "dar" to about 5 miles to simulate human eyes. Oh well... Gums-san sends... |
Author: | Beaver [ Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
Looking at the DAR map, 2 is uncovered and 12 & 11 have minimal cover. If we go back to Pearl with bombs, the least DAR is for an attack from the South. |
Author: | MuskieZZ [ Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TTT - Frame 2 - DAR |
I am finishing my testing and expect orders up tomorrow morning. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |