S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3
 >> Next 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:36 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:14 am
Posts: 1047
dawger wrote:

Sacrificed ourselves due to poor mission planning by strike group and incurred losses as a result.



Dobs, then Dawger needs to apologize to Muskyzz for this stupid statement.


Capt Hawk
CO - The Knights Who Say Ni!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:09 pm
Posts: 571
Location: Northern Minnesota
=dobs= wrote:
Just so everyone was clear the engagement happened BELOW F2.......6 3 5ish was first contact.

We ran into the allied as they were driving SOUTH from F2 toward F9.

They were 25+, they numbered 10+, and they were the first of 3 high groups we encountered.

Now imagine the 3 high groups converging on the Southern strike force at once vs separated groups.

Close escort, LOW does not work when you have an aircraft that is inferior to speed and dive to your enemy.

23rd was aware of our forward position, and I put it out on country when we found large groups S of 2... Think the call was heavy group of bandits 6 2 to 6 3, 25k+. Second call was first group retrograde, and then the Heavy group 25k+ S of f12.

We ran into friendlies before we lost most of our guys.... Had at least a friendly 2 ship come from the South and merged with us....Saw Sqtch dragging S, came in behind his group, they broke off..went back N picked up more who were inbound Pearl and then when we went after them is when we ended up losing the majority of our guys.

475th was not glory seeking..wish my video ran so you can see us forcing guys to dive out...on to next, force them to dive out...intent to get them low so the Southern group wouldn't be playing dodge ball against 450 mph porcupines.

Dobs





Dobs, just so we are clear, I KNOW the 475th, including Dawger, tried their hardest! You guys always do. You guys wanted to accomplish a goal of getting the high guys down and keeping the northern guys out of the fight.

All I am saying is that wasn't the "plan". I was hoping if the north was clear they would be suspicious of a north strike and leave 10 or so planes up there. I wanted the northern US guys to come down as we were leaving and have them chasing us over the water so they cant easily re-base. When you guys went through F2, they all followed you. All 40 of them ended up at Pearl.

Another problem I see from your post and Sasquatch post, there were only 12 ((4) 23rd and (8) 475th) of you!!!!! I was expecting the 22 from the table! where was everyone? having 1/2 the escorts there really throws a monkey wrench into plans.


Hawk wrote:
dawger wrote:

Sacrificed ourselves due to poor mission planning by strike group and incurred losses as a result.



Dobs, then Dawger needs to apologize to Muskyzz for this stupid statement.


No one owes anyone anything. We just all need to be more tolerant and remember this is a game. We all are doing our best to accomplish a goal. Everyone has different goals.

This 1/2 of the series is done. we will have to see how the second half goes.


<S!>
MuskyZ
Newest member of the 4th

No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
George S. Patton


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Just to add my Nickel's worth (no pennies in Canada now) I have CO'd over 60 frames and played for over 15 years (I started in Frame 2 of the First S3) and except when Thor was posting I have never seen such blatant condemnation of CO or bomber's plans. Over the years we have had some really bad plans that looked good on paper and some plans that looked iffy and worked like a charm. You need to remember that the guys on the other side can do things that either work into your plans or not.

Suggestions are always appreciated by any CO, but sometimes the CO sees things differently and once the orders are finalized that should be the end of the issue. I am sure when the 475th is COing a frame they will get suggestions, but as the CO, it is their call.

Let's all take a chill pill and put this unfortunate incident behind us and try to keep things on a civil level in the future.


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
Posted Saturday Morning in the orders thread

dawger wrote:
Dobs and I haven't had a chance to discuss this frame but here are my thoughts.

With the bombers going in at 15K they will be easily seen by high enemy fighters, who can dive at will away from the Zeroes. We definitely need a HIGH remote escort sweeping the way to try to break up high enemy formations. And we will need a close escort to try to prevent the second pass of the enemy fighters. A saving grace is the Kate isn't fast enough to make getting back to the bombers after chasing Allied fighters low and behind nearly impossible. I see no way to prevent catastrophic losses to bombers given the shortage of escort pilots, the poor choice of ingress altitude and the total lack of defensive firepower of the Kate.

Close escort will need to be disciplined and break off any pursuit that exceeds 230 mph 5 K below bomber altitude. Remote escort will need to hike up their skirts and entice the enemy away from the bombers because once the Allies see the bomber formation every Zero will be a cheerleader watching P-40's at 450 mph dive through the formation.

My inclination is to assign the 23rd to Close escort and the 475FG will assume Remote


Posted later Saturday in the same thread.

dawger wrote:
Hawk wrote:
Dawger,

Please explain this comment.

Quote:
the poor choice of ingress altitude


You have chosen the altitude at which the enemy fighters perform best, you are high enough that he can still see you from his maximum altitude and you have given him plenty of room to dive out if he gets in trouble. Your escorts cannot catch him in the dive and cannot maneuver with him above 230 mph.

If you were on the deck, high enemy fighters won't be able to see you and you remove his diving escape route, pinning him to the deck if he wants to attack bombers.

The only other choice is to operate at the enemy maximum altitude, giving the advantage to YOUR escorts, who perform better than the enemy up high.

At 15,000 feet the enemy will be able to easily spot you, make diving passes on you and extend away from the escort untouched and rinse and repeat. We will kill only the stupid ones (luckily there are quite a few of those)


No response, no indication the Frame CO even read it.

We did exactly what we said we were going to do. The Frame CO designated the 475FG as southern group fighter CO and I posted our intentions and exactly WHY we were going to do what we did.

Once we encountered 25+ enemy fighters I knew we had two choices, turn tail and let them slaughter the bombers or sacrifice MY group so that maybe we could distract them long enough, which is what we did.

I expressed my misgivings with the planned strike, advising that a sweep in force prior to any strike even took off would be ideal. Second choice was for the strike to be on the deck to remove the enemy dive advantage where CLOSE escort could pin the enemy on the deck. Third choice was an ingress above 25K to take the enemy out of their best operational envelope.

None of those things were entertained.

And now you are upset with me because I posted the unvarnished truth in the AAR.

What is the point of posting a plan or posting AAR's?

Is this a knitting circle or a competitive game?

We got our asses kicked very predictably and you are mad at the guy with the temerity to say what everyone else in a fighter was thinking.

I somehow suspect the strike group WONT be at 15,000 in frame 4.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:29 am
Posts: 230
[quote="MuskieZZ ]

Another problem I see from your post and Sasquatch post, there were only 12 ((4) 23rd and (8) 475th) of you!!!!! I was expecting the 22 from the table! where was everyone? having 1/2 the escorts there really throws a monkey wrench into plans.
[/quote]

Fwiw the 23rd has had 11-12 regulars (13 once ) show, hence the 2 step designation.


Sasquatch"
=sqtc=
23rd Fighter Group
CO


"You know you loaded too much fuel only when you see fire" :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:09 pm
Posts: 571
Location: Northern Minnesota
Guys, lets ALL give it a rest.

What should have happened is I should have gotten Dawger and Dobs on TS after dobs raised the concern and talked about it and came to a mutual decision. I have a terrible time getting on the boards Friday afternoons through Sunday afternoon. Every frame I CO I like to get orders up by Thursday to give some time for a response. I am usually working out of town during the week so when I get home I do fam. stuff on the weekends.

It is over, done, and JUST A GAME. We will do better next time.

sorry if I stirred the pot.


<S!>
MuskyZ
Newest member of the 4th

No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
George S. Patton


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:24 pm 

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:36 pm
Posts: 191
In the meantime, the 475th is considering a "Go Fund Me" page to help raise funds for an all expense paid trip to attend Dale Carnegie's "how to win friends and influence people" seminars. The seminars are usually a 2 day event. We're hoping to raise enough funds to pay for an entire week. Once the funds are raised, we will um... draw straws to see which one of us gets to attend :) Dobs usually manages to win the good prizes during our quarterly rah-rah meetings, We'll see how it goes this time around :)

Great job on closing 2 & 8 late in the frame. -S's to Swanee who I think took down at least 3, maybe 4 bad guys, and a huge -S to Dolch for achieving ACE status, and living to tell about it!!!

Thanks for taking the big chair MuskieZZ, and with any luck at all.... we'll see you in frame 3 & 4!

-S's


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:58 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:44 am
Posts: 171
Location: Texas
Thank it is more like "I'll SHOW YOU":


Salute,
Gofly
AG-8-Doolittle Raiders
Member, Nomads
WBs 2004


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:58 pm
Posts: 341
=dobs= wrote:
In the future, we need a Bomber CO and a Fighter CO.

Why? The S3 title banner advertises "Sixteen years of war" I have flown the first two or so years of it and the last four. Never has there been a demand for more than one CO per frame. What is so special about you guys that you WANT 2 COs per frame and why should the rest comply?

=dobs= wrote:
Call Dawger what you want,

Sure as you wish!

He's a perfect asshole who does not care about teamwork, demands respect while dishing out disrespect all the time and abandons the bomber group for a few minutes of fighter glory. He has claimed in the past that he'd much rather let the bomber group die than speak up early when the orders are out. So we all know where he stands.

And BTW. One Rotten Apple does spoil the bunch. As much as I respect you and dazed who have been trying to tone this conversation down with your excuses and "sweet" interpretations, I for one will inform my squad to not expect any help from the 475th FG if you are ever assigned to escort us.


=dobs= wrote:
but he at least went out to try to ensure success for the buffs by engaging and forcing high bandits down prior to strike. 8 V Allied fighter force at 25k plus was not a great bundle of fun...as it was, if we had done close escort we would have been playing "whack a mole" as the moles alongside the 23rd.

At least this way the sacrificial lamb wave only lost some and not all....

First of all, he suggested that the bombers be either at 25k or on the deck. At 25K you would have met the enemy co-alt and provide the same excuse, oh they dove away and then came back up with their superior climbing power etc. On the deck the ack would kill us and you would have never come met the bombers. we saw this Frame 1 and in the previous series so it was not as if he was giving any viable options.


The brave KoN fighters ALWAYS fly close escort and have been doing a wonderful job! ~S~ KoN Fighters.

=dobs= wrote:
So in the future:
--Have a Sweep-- causes confusion and breaks up cohesion of the defenders
-- condense time over target for all strikers by having simultaneous strikes on the targets
---causes dilution of enemy forces--they can't hit both waves that way with full force

The whole sweep thing has not worked, they will simply avoid the sweep till they find the bombers
We just don't have enough bomber pilots to hit multiple targets at once. This is something everyone should be aware of and plan accordingly.

=dobs= wrote:
--Pick an altitude which will either maximize your success and survivability or maximize the problems for the enemy....preferably a combination of both. The 16k ingress put you in the "I can see you from any alt" block, "I can be above you and hit you with speed"...thus negating escort department, and "I can dive away at my leisure because I know your fighters can't follow" department.

Again the only choice you guys (yes I'm bunching the apples together now) gave us was 25K or On Deck. Both were out of the question.


=dobs= wrote:
--Consult your Fighter Co to see where their advantages lie in relationship to the enemy in order to maximize their ability to do their job of trying to keep you alive.
Dobs


Again what "Fighter CO"? As far as we ALL knew each frame has 1 CO.

~S~ to all who worked as a team
-noflyz


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:51 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
noflyz wrote:
=dobs= wrote:
In the future, we need a Bomber CO and a Fighter CO.

Why? The S3 title banner advertises "Sixteen years of war" I have flown the first two or so years of it and the last four. Never has there been a demand for more than one CO per frame. What is so special about you guys that you WANT 2 COs per frame and why should the rest comply?

=dobs= wrote:
Call Dawger what you want,

Sure as you wish!

He's a perfect asshole who does not care about teamwork, demands respect while dishing out disrespect all the time and abandons the bomber group for a few minutes of fighter glory. He has claimed in the past that he'd much rather let the bomber group die than speak up early when the orders are out. So we all know where he stands.

And BTW. One Rotten Apple does spoil the bunch. As much as I respect you and dazed who have been trying to tone this conversation down with your excuses and "sweet" interpretations, I for one will inform my squad to not expect any help from the 475th FG if you are ever assigned to escort us.


=dobs= wrote:
but he at least went out to try to ensure success for the buffs by engaging and forcing high bandits down prior to strike. 8 V Allied fighter force at 25k plus was not a great bundle of fun...as it was, if we had done close escort we would have been playing "whack a mole" as the moles alongside the 23rd.

At least this way the sacrificial lamb wave only lost some and not all....

First of all, he suggested that the bombers be either at 25k or on the deck. At 25K you would have met the enemy co-alt and provide the same excuse, oh they dove away and then came back up with their superior climbing power etc. On the deck the ack would kill us and you would have never come met the bombers. we saw this Frame 1 and in the previous series so it was not as if he was giving any viable options.


The brave KoN fighters ALWAYS fly close escort and have been doing a wonderful job! ~S~ KoN Fighters.

=dobs= wrote:
So in the future:
--Have a Sweep-- causes confusion and breaks up cohesion of the defenders
-- condense time over target for all strikers by having simultaneous strikes on the targets
---causes dilution of enemy forces--they can't hit both waves that way with full force

The whole sweep thing has not worked, they will simply avoid the sweep till they find the bombers
We just don't have enough bomber pilots to hit multiple targets at once. This is something everyone should be aware of and plan accordingly.

=dobs= wrote:
--Pick an altitude which will either maximize your success and survivability or maximize the problems for the enemy....preferably a combination of both. The 16k ingress put you in the "I can see you from any alt" block, "I can be above you and hit you with speed"...thus negating escort department, and "I can dive away at my leisure because I know your fighters can't follow" department.

Again the only choice you guys (yes I'm bunching the apples together now) gave us was 25K or On Deck. Both were out of the question.


=dobs= wrote:
--Consult your Fighter Co to see where their advantages lie in relationship to the enemy in order to maximize their ability to do their job of trying to keep you alive.
Dobs


Again what "Fighter CO"? As far as we ALL knew each frame has 1 CO.

~S~ to all who worked as a team
-noflyz


My video of us "not supporting" the bombers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npyjfuuQWpM

And you are correct, there is absolutely no need for better planning by the bombers. As we saw in BBD, when the opposition executes well, the bombers settings get revised to keep them alive.

Unfortunately, Jabo can't do that this series.

See you at 15K in frame 4 and I hope every fighter is embedded in the closest possible escort.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3
 >> Next 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.