S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9
 >> Next 
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:21 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
Madcat wrote:
dawger wrote:

I havent messed with the P36 FM this summer.

Is there some reason to change what it has right now?

We used it for Pearl Harbor and I didn't get any great amount of feedback either way on it.

Our last conversation about the P-36 found the models CG was off. That's why there was a major push to get the proper cp in. We couldn't fix the CG using the p-40e cp.
CG is correct now.


I did not realize you did a CG fix on the P36 3D model.

I will make sure to test it on the new model ASAP and correct the FM as necessary.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 12:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:28 am
Posts: 144
dawger wrote:
Madcat wrote:
dawger wrote:

I havent messed with the P36 FM this summer.

Is there some reason to change what it has right now?

We used it for Pearl Harbor and I didn't get any great amount of feedback either way on it.

Our last conversation about the P-36 found the models CG was off. That's why there was a major push to get the proper cp in. We couldn't fix the CG using the p-40e cp.
CG is correct now.


I did not realize you did a CG fix on the P36 3D model.

I will make sure to test it on the new model ASAP and correct the FM as necessary.

If it has the new cp, that's the one I'll try and send screenshots that show the move.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 712
Location: Ottawa
Bit of a thread hijack, or maybe it's already too late...
Dawger,
Curious on relative turning capabilities of the p-51d as compared to the Spit 9b at equal weights. Anecdotally the Spit should turn better in most flight conditions, especially given relative wing loading. Has the new combat flap setting given the pony better turning capability (instantaneous and sustained) as compared to the Spit?

------------
Edited for auto spell correct errors :(


Muzz
muzz--
Sqn Ldr
past-CO 417 Sqn RCAF
"Supporting Liberty and Justice"
--------------------------------------
Muzz's Maps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:50 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 712
Location: Ottawa
Other stuff J,
I've been more than a bit lazy on the Normandy terrain over the past few months. Unless you have been beavering away on it I need to get off my butt, as it were.


Muzz
muzz--
Sqn Ldr
past-CO 417 Sqn RCAF
"Supporting Liberty and Justice"
--------------------------------------
Muzz's Maps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 3:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Sounds like you have been working hard this summer, Kudos to you all.

My only concern is, does the Spit IXe or Spit IXb have drop tanks?


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:32 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:45 am
Posts: 131
9b for sure...have to check the 9e


352nd Fighter Group (V) - "The Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney"
328th Fighter Squadron C.O. (V) - PE - Red and Green

dulce bellum inexpertis

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:25 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
Muzz wrote:
Bit of a thread hijack, or maybe it's already too late...
Dawger,
Curious on relative turning capabilities of the p-51d as compared to the Spit 9b at equal weights. Anecdotally the Spit should turn better in most flight conditions, especially given relative wing loading. Has the new combat flap setting given the pony better turning capability (instantaneous and sustained) as compared to the Spit?

------------
Edited for auto spell correct errors :(


A complex question answer in all respects.

First they can never be at equal weights. The P51D with no fuel weighs 1200 lbs more than a Spit 9 full of fuel.

Stall speed drives ALL turning capability with excess power available determining the sustained turning capability.

I build each model to stall POWER OFF in a CLEAN configuration at the SPEED and WEIGHT published on the datasheet I am presented.

So the Spit 9 B is built to stall at 85 mph IAS at 7300 lbs. The P51D is built to stall at 103 mph IAS at 9611 lbs. (The current P51D was about 900 lbs light and this has been corrected in the new FM)

The first 10 degrees of ANY wing flap system is mostly lift. A Fowler flap system that increases wing area AND changes camber produces more lift than a wing flap system that only changes camber but they all produce lots of lift with little drag in that first notch.

Maneuver flaps are just the ability to use that first notch of flaps at a high speed in Warbirds. Most airplanes of the era had flap controls that allowed selection of any flap deflection so Warbirds has always had multiple stages of flaps available at varying speeds. I have always had a bit of heartburn with this because the reality is that these flap controls that allow any selection are rather finicky and nailing a particular deflection angle in a combat situation would be fairly difficult. This is why "Maneuver Flap" settings were built into later versions of these aircraft, to give the pilot a positive detent or stop to easily position the flaps in combat. Modern aircraft have very positive flap detents with no option for intermediate positions so pilots dont rip them off.

So the P51 has a maneuver flap setting allowing it to select the first "notch" up to 400 mph. This increases available lift and decreases stall speed? How much?

My research indicates a 15 to 25% reduction in stall speed depending on type and total area of flaps. I have to approximate this stall speed reduction by adjusting the lift value for the first stage of flaps.

So at first glance the P51 with maneuver flap would seem to possibly equal the Spitfire 9b in turn but two things make a big difference.

The Spitfire 9b is much lighter so it has plenty excess power. It can sustain a 4 G turn from a 300 mph entry for 360 with no problem at full fuel (7327 lbs). The P51D cannot do that at 67% fuel (9611 lbs)

And the P51 laminar flow wing creates a LOT of induced drag so sustained turn performance suffers.

The maneuver flap gives the P51 tremendous instantaneous nose rate at high speed (it does this for everything that has it) but it isn't going to be a better turn fighter than the Spit 9.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:42 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 712
Location: Ottawa
Doh! I should have remembered the relative empty weights of both aircraft. Rest of your points are inline with my thinking for the RL aircraft. From that, I think safe to assume you've done the best you can to model it in the game. Higher drag with greater flap extensions should put an end (in most not all cases) to ponies out-turning spits in sustained turn fights on the deck. Thanks for the answer.


Muzz
muzz--
Sqn Ldr
past-CO 417 Sqn RCAF
"Supporting Liberty and Justice"
--------------------------------------
Muzz's Maps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:50 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:45 am
Posts: 131
Beaver wrote:
Sounds like you have been working hard this summer, Kudos to you all.

My only concern is, does the Spit IXe or Spit IXb have drop tanks?


IX b/e and XIV now have DT and accurate bomb loads.

:D


352nd Fighter Group (V) - "The Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney"
328th Fighter Squadron C.O. (V) - PE - Red and Green

dulce bellum inexpertis

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 9:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:25 pm
Posts: 661
Muzz wrote:
Doh! I should have remembered the relative empty weights of both aircraft. Rest of your points are inline with my thinking for the RL aircraft. From that, I think safe to assume you've done the best you can to model it in the game. Higher drag with greater flap extensions should put an end (in most not all cases) to ponies out-turning spits in sustained turn fights on the deck. Thanks for the answer.


We will see :shock:

I may be burned in effigy next week.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9
 >> Next 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.