S3 Series

Home Page FAQ Team Search
  Register
Login 
View unanswered posts View active topics  

Delete all board cookies

All times are UTC




New Topic Post Reply  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3
  Print view
Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2016 11:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Gums wrote:
Salute!

Dobs has it right.

Hitting a V-1 would likely result in a big, fast-burning fire, but not a huge explosion. Would look like the WB kill graphics. The explosions we see on the WW2 film is likely the remaining fuel on the missile.

Gums sends...


Right on Gums, I killed them and they just headed to ground on fire. Nice to see, but I wouldn't want to be in the LZ of those flaming bombs. ;)


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 4:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Toronto, ON
Sakai wrote:
Thats weird, Nick.


I was able to update to FL2036 on Friday.

However, in the update I did NOT have the G14 available online, while Jugggo (PC) did have the G14.


That's okay Sakai, you don't need the G14 ;)


CO Beaver
RCAF 417 (II/Wing 127)
City of Windsor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 7:45 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 6:51 pm
Posts: 18
Approved SAFE V1 interception method. (Depicted in simulation)

[YouTube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0sgsiMzRnU[/YouTube]


"Live to fly. Fly to fight. Fight to live. Recycle..." ~ Odee 475th FS CLOVER 2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 7:51 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 6:51 pm
Posts: 18
=dobs= wrote:
Second link is to a recent "duds provide badguys with easy IEDs" type article.

<S> Gums!

V1's are not IED's, nor did they use current tech fuzing.

"The Defence Committee expressed some doubt as to the ability of the Royal Observer Corps to adequately deal with the new threat, but the ROC's Commandant Air Commodore Finlay Crerar assured the committee that the ROC could again rise to the occasion and prove its alertness and flexibility. He oversaw plans for handling the new threat, codenamed by the RAF and ROC as "Operation Totter".

Observers at the coast post of Dymchurch identified the very first of these weapons and within seconds of their report the anti-aircraft defences were in action. This new weapon gave the ROC much additional work both at posts and operations rooms. Eventually RAF controllers actually took their radio equipment to the two closest ROC operations rooms at Horsham and Maidstone, and vectored fighters direct from the ROC's plotting tables. The critics who had said that the Corps would be unable to handle the fast-flying jet aircraft were answered when these aircraft on their first operation were actually controlled entirely by using ROC information both on the coast and at inland.
The average speed of V-1s was 550 km/h (340 mph) and their average altitude was 1,000 m (3,300 ft) to 1,200 m (3,900 ft). Fighter aircraft required excellent low altitude performance to intercept them and enough firepower to ensure that they were destroyed in the air rather than crashing to earth and detonating. Most aircraft were too slow to catch a V-1 unless they had a height advantage, allowing them to gain speed by diving on their target.
When V-1 attacks began in mid-June 1944, the only aircraft with the low-altitude speed to be effective against it was the Hawker Tempest. Fewer than 30 Tempests were available. They were assigned to No. 150 Wing RAF. Early attempts to intercept and destroy V-1s often failed, but improved techniques soon emerged. These included using the airflow over an interceptor's wing to raise one wing of the V-1, by sliding the wingtip to within 6 in (15 cm) of the lower surface of the V-1's wing. If properly executed, this manoeuvre would tip the V-1's wing up, overriding the gyro and sending the V-1 into an out-of-control dive. At least sixteen V-1s were destroyed this way (the first by a P-51 piloted by Major R. E. Turner of 356th Fighter Squadron on 18 June).[30] It could be seen that the aerodynamic flip method was actually effective when V-1s could be seen over southern parts of the Netherlands headed due eastwards at low altitude, the engine quenched. In early 1945 such a missile soared below clouds over Tilburg to gently alight eastwards of the city in open fields.

The Tempest fleet was built up to over 100 aircraft by September. Specially modified P-47M Thunderbolts (half their fuel tanks, half their 0.5in {12.7 mm} machine guns, boosted engines (2800 hp), all external fittings, and all their armour plate removed) were also pressed into service against the V-1s. In addition, North American P-51 Mustangs and Griffon-engined Supermarine Spitfire Mk XIVs were tuned to make them almost fast enough, and during the short summer nights the Tempests shared defensive duty with de Havilland Mosquitos. There was no need for airborne radar; at night the V-1's engine could be heard from 10 mi (16 km) away or more, and the exhaust plume was visible from a long distance. Wing Commander Roland Beamont had the 20 mm cannon on his Tempest adjusted to converge at 300 yd (270 m) ahead. This was so successful that all other aircraft in 150 Wing were thus modified.

The anti-V-1 sorties by fighters were known as "Diver patrols" (after "Diver", the codename used by the Royal Observer Corps for V-1 sightings). Attacking a V-1 was dangerous: machine guns had little effect on the V-1's sheet steel structure, and if a cannon shell detonated the warhead, the explosion could destroy the attacker.

A Spitfire using its wingtip to "topple" a V-1 flying bomb
In daylight, V-1 chases were chaotic and often unsuccessful until a special defence zone was declared between London and the coast, in which only the fastest fighters were permitted. The first interception of a V-1 was by F/L J. G. Musgrave with a No. 605 Squadron RAF Mosquito night fighter on the night of 14/15 June 1944. Between June and 5 September 1944, a handful of 150 Wing Tempests shot down 638 flying bombs,[31] with No. 3 Squadron RAF alone claiming 305. One Tempest pilot, Squadron Leader Joseph Berry (RAF officer) (501 Squadron), shot down 59 V-1s, the Belgian ace Squadron Leader Remy Van Lierde (164 Squadron) destroyed 44 (with a further nine shared) and W/C Roland Beamont (see above) destroyed 31.

The next most successful interceptors were the Mosquito (623 victories),[32] Spitfire XIV (303),[33] and Mustang (232). All other types combined added 158. Even though it was not fully operational, the jet-powered Gloster Meteor was rushed into service with No. 616 Squadron RAF to fight the V-1s. It had ample speed but its cannon were prone to jamming, and it shot down only 13 V-1s.[34]

In late 1944 a radar-equipped Vickers Wellington bomber was modified for use by the RAF's Fighter Interception Unit as an Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft.[35] Flying at an altitude of 4,000 feet (1,200 m) over the North Sea, it directed Mosquito fighters charged with intercepting He 111s from Dutch airbases that sought to launch V-1s from the air."


"Live to fly. Fly to fight. Fight to live. Recycle..." ~ Odee 475th FS CLOVER 2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Offline 
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 12:23 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:08 pm
Posts: 750
"The V-1's warhead included a electrical fuze; a backup mechanical fuze; and a time-delay fuze (130 minutes....time to target ~22 minutes), to ensure that the weapon destroyed itself if the other fuzes failed to work. The fuzing system was very reliable, and very few V-1s were duds."

2 of 3 fuzes that were initiated by contact. Time delay fuze was added to make sure they went boom.

http://greyfalcon.us/restored/The%20V.htm

"A spinner on the nose armed the warhead after about 100 kilometers (60 miles) of flight, and determined when the weapon would fall to earth. However, a few documents state that rather than using a nose spinner this function was performed by a simple clock. Illustrations are ambiguous on this issue, and it is very possible that different production runs used different systems." -http://www.atlantikwall.org.uk/v1_history1.htm

Schematic of the nose assembly.
Attachment:
V1 Fuzing.JPG
V1 Fuzing.JPG [ 65.84 KiB | Viewed 3924 times ]

From Disarming Hitlerês V Weapons: Bomb Disposal, the V1 and V2 rockets
By Chris Ransted


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Search for:
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
New Topic Post Reply  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page
 Previous << 
1, 2, 3

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  

Powered by The S-3.